In 1988, Apple Inc. filed a landmark lawsuit in opposition to Microsoft. The go well with claimed that Microsoft Home windows used graphical consumer interface (GUI) components too just like these in Apple merchandise such because the Macintosh working system.
At a decide’s behest, Apple ultimately named greater than 200 GUI working system parts, comparable to resizable, overlapping home windows, title bars and different options that it felt encompassed a selected “appear and feel” protected by copyright. Contemplating the scale and wealth of the businesses concerned, and the technological minutia that the case revolved round, it is no shock that the case dragged on for about 5 years.
Apple had licensed portions of its GUI to Microsoft for Windows version 1.0. However, Gates’ development teams took full advantage of those GUI elements for subsequent Windows operating systems, too. As the lawsuit progressed, newer versions of Windows based on those GUI components became more and more popular.
Apple lawyers argued that their licensing agreement (including GUI design) with Microsoft was in effect for only one version of Windows. Microsoft disagreed. As the case unfolded, Gates told InfoWorld newsweekly, “We’re saying that these graphic interface techniques, the ideas, are not copyrightable.”
In 1993, Judge Vaughn Walker with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with Microsoft, throwing out all of Apple’s arguments [source: Andrews]. Nonetheless, regardless of the authorized system’s judgment, and just like the opposite Gates myths we have talked about, conspiracy theories and rumors about these occasions will in all probability be round for so long as we use the Internet.