For what it’s price, the pictures I took in daylight of my corgi, Max, on the SE appeared simply pretty much as good as comparable pictures with the iPhone 11 and different telephones in the marketplace, like Google’s $399 Pixel 3A. They got here out crisp with natural-looking colours and good shadow element.
Let’s speak about that display and residential button
The opposite function that makes the SE cheaper is the very first thing you’ll take a look at: the display.
At 4.7 inches, the show is smaller than the jumbo 6.1-inch display on the iPhone 11. However that could be a profit. The 4.7-inch dimension is best suited to one-hand use, so it’s straightforward to make use of your thumb to succeed in from the house button to every nook of the display. Additionally essential, the cellphone’s smaller physique suits extra comfortably in a pocket.
The SE’s second huge price saver is the usage of a house button for unlocking the system, somewhat than the face scanners seen on trendy smartphones. The iPhone fingerprint scanners have at all times labored shortly and reliably, and so does this one.
It may be good to have a face scanner, however many people will in all probability be pleased with out the function if it means saving some cash. For comparability, I’ve given huge minus factors to $1,000 telephones, just like the Samsung Galaxy S10, for a awful fingerprint reader and a subpar face scanner.
Placing the iPhone SE’s worth in perspective
To completely perceive the SE’s worth, it’s essential to notice that this isn’t Apple’s first rodeo with a less expensive iPhone. These previous fashions weren’t as compelling when put next with their pricier counterparts. To wit:
The $549 iPhone 5C, launched in 2013, got here in colourful plastic and felt cheaper and slower than the iPhone 5S, the mannequin with a smooth aluminum physique that price $100 extra.
The $399 iPhone SE from 2016 had the design of older iPhones, with the identical computing energy as newer ones on the time. But that SE had a notably inferior digicam and dimmer display than its $649, bigger-screen counterpart on the time, the iPhone 6S.
This time, the brand new SE’s trade-offs appear trivial. No face scanner, capturing photographs in the dead of night or humongous display? These are minor inconveniences if you find yourself paying 40 % lower than for an iPhone 11.
I’ll word one huge draw back: The SE has considerably shorter battery life than the iPhone 11.
After a day of capturing photographs and juggling work duties, the SE battery wanted to be replenished by dinnertime. With the costlier cellphone, I had greater than 25 % battery by bedtime. So individuals who work lengthy hours and depend on their telephones would in all probability be happier with a high-end one.
So who’s the anticipated purchaser?
I’m not the goal demographic for the SE since I’m prepared to pay for fancier options. I splurged on the $999 iPhone XS two years in the past as a result of I cherished taking portrait photographs of meals and my canines.